HomeNewsAnalysisStudy Examines Drug and Human Trafficking Overlap in Mexico
ANALYSIS

Study Examines Drug and Human Trafficking Overlap in Mexico

HUMAN SMUGGLING / 21 DEC 2016 BY PATRICK CORCORAN EN

A recent study from a pair of academics specializing on border issues finds a wide degree of overlap between coyotes and drug traffickers along the US-Mexico border, with government policies helping to encourage the blurring of the lines between the two illicit activities.

The 2016 paper "On Narco-coyotaje: Illicit Regimes and Their Impacts on the US-Mexico Border," by Howard Campbell and Jeremy Slack, probes the dynamics along the Mexican border between human traffickers, or coyotes, and their criminal cousins who traffic drugs.

Based largely on interviews with migrants in Tamaulipas, Sonora, and Baja California, the authors' basic finding is that where once coyotes and drug traffickers operated in separate spheres, today there is a great deal of collaborative overlap. According to Campbell and Slack, who teach at the University of Texas-El Paso, this evolution essentially coincides with the growth of "a criminal hierarchy prioritizing the most powerful and profitable clandestine activity...drug trafficking".

But while drug traffickers have exerted increased authority over coyotes in recent years, the circumstances of this hierarchy vary greatly from one part of the country to the other. In Tamaulipas, for instance, the coyotes essentially worked at the pleasure of the dominant local groups -- either the Zetas and the Gulf Cartel, depending on the city. In practice, this means the coyotes would make protection payments and would operate according to a detailed set of rules established by the drug gangs about how coyotes must operate. Migrants would often be obligated to provide occasional monitoring services for shipments of drugs. Migrants and coyotes who broke with the dictates would be punished, often beaten and kidnapped.

SEE ALSO: Coverage of Human Smuggling

In other parts of the country, such as the Sonora Desert, dominant local drug gangs (typically affiliated with the Sinaloa Cartel) exercise much less immediate control. The authors describe local gangs as protecting human trafficking markets from stick-up artists targeting cash-rich migrants, occasionally using migrant groups to tote drug stashes across the border, and preventing them from walking where they don't want to draw the attention of the US Border Patrol. More recently, a local gang set up a checkpoint on the road from Altar, Sonora, to the border, in which migrants were charged a fee for passage.

InSight Crime Analysis

Slack and Campbell describe a high degree of fluidity in the interactions between coyotes and drug traffickers. Most coyotes have a clear incentive to have at least some relationship with the drug traffickers, even beyond the need to pay protection fees. Coyotes have intimate knowledge of the terrain and the US authorities on the other side of the border, so they have highly sought-after skills for gangs slipping drugs into US cities. Many specialists in moving drug shipments across the border originally learned their trade working as coyotes.

Typically, however, they do not operate as members of a given gang. Instead, they are independent entrepreneurs who will work with the traffickers opportunistically.

Attempts in the US and Mexico to crack down on coyotes essentially made human trafficking a more dangerous industry, and pushed the coyotes into some degree of allegiance with a far more dangerous group of criminal operators.

As noted above, the authors describe an evolution toward more interaction between the two criminal spheres over the course of recent Mexican history. One big factor driving this was the increased difficulty in sneaking humans across the border, which was a product of ramped-up US border enforcement in the 1990s. The greater challenge demanded greater professionalization from the human traffickers, who began charging more and arming themselves. The increased margins and the need for firepower, in turn, lured in more powerful players.

If the chance at big revenues pulled in the drug gangs, two other factors from within Mexico also pushed them in the same direction. First, the crackdown on the movement of cocaine and other drugs encouraged them to diversify their revenues. Human trafficking was an obvious new revenue stream, though not the only one. As InSight Crime has documented, gangs like the Zetas have engaged in extortion, oil theft, kidnapping for ransom, and many other illicit activities, where in years past drug gangs focused almost exclusively on trafficking.

Second, the chaos ensuing from the drug wars started under former President Felipe Calderón wrought a breakdown in governance in certain parts of the country such as Tamaulipas. In these areas, the gangland hierarchies essentially usurped certain functions of the state. The expanding authority of hegemonic gangs gave them influence over a wide range of legal and illegal activities, including human trafficking.

Some analysts dispute descriptions of substantial overlap between human and drug traffickers. Guadalupe Correa Cabrera, a University of Texas-Rio Grande Valley professor and Wilson Center Fellow, has published recent research downplaying the two realms' interactions. In an interview with InSight Crime, Correa Cabrera reiterated that the high point of collaboration between drug smugglers and coyotes came from 2010 to 2013, but since then it has faded, as government efforts to break up trafficking cells have rendered them less powerful. She also said that it was never particularly strong for migrants travelling on one of the western routes.

SEE ALSO: Coverage of US-Mexico Border

Correa Cabrera did agree that the militarization of the border has had a profound impact on smuggling patterns. "Coyotes are becoming more corporatized," she said. "Before, smugglers were able to do their jobs on a one-on-one basis. It was like a family-style business. [The militarization] has made them more oligopolized."

Both Correa Cabrera's comments and the paper by Slack and Campbell point to a fundamental irony with lessons for the future: Attempts in the US and Mexico to crack down on coyotes essentially made human trafficking a more dangerous industry, and pushed the coyotes into some degree of allegiance with a far more dangerous group of criminal operators. This represents another demonstration of how get-tough security policies can actually achieve the opposite of their intended effect. 

share icon icon icon

Was this content helpful?

We want to sustain Latin America’s largest organized crime database, but in order to do so, we need resources.

DONATE

What are your thoughts? Click here to send InSight Crime your comments.

We encourage readers to copy and distribute our work for non-commercial purposes, with attribution to InSight Crime in the byline and links to the original at both the top and bottom of the article. Check the Creative Commons website for more details of how to share our work, and please send us an email if you use an article.

Was this content helpful?

We want to sustain Latin America’s largest organized crime database, but in order to do so, we need resources.

DONATE

Related Content

MEXICO / 11 JAN 2011

A recent US Army-commissioned study found that Mexican cartels have entered into 48 of the 50 U.S. states, and have…

HOMICIDES / 28 JAN 2021

Nineteen people shot and burned in a Mexico border state near Texas is a macabre reminder that migrants being smuggled…

MEXICO / 8 FEB 2016

In this analysis of the similarities between Islamic terrorist groups and Mexican cartels, David Martínez-Amador explores how the strategy to…

About InSight Crime

THE ORGANIZATION

Venezuela's Cocaine Revolution Met With Uproar

6 MAY 2022

On May 4, InSight Crime launched its latest investigation, Venezuela’s Cocaine Revolution¸ accompanied by a virtual panel on its findings. The takeaways from this three-year effort, including the fact that Venezuela…

THE ORGANIZATION

Venezuela Drug Trafficking Investigation and InDepth Gender Coverage

29 APR 2022

On May 4, InSight Crime will be publishing The Cocaine Revolution in Venezuela, a groundbreaking investigation into how the Venezuelan government regulates the cocaine trade in the country. An accompanying event,…

THE ORGANIZATION

InDepth Coverage of Juan Orlando Hernández

22 APR 2022

Ever since Juan Orlando Hernández was elected president of Honduras in 2014, InSight Crime has provided coverage of every twist and turn during his rollercoaster time in office, amid growing…

THE ORGANIZATION

Venezuela's Cocaine Revolution

15 APR 2022

On May 4th, InSight Crime will publish a groundbreaking investigation on drug trafficking in Venezuela. A product of three years of field research across the country, the study uncovers cocaine production in…

LA ORGANIZACIÓN

Widespread Coverage of InSight Crime MS13 Investigation

8 APR 2022

In a joint investigation with La Prensa Gráfica, InSight Crime recently revealed that four of the MS13’s foremost leaders had been quietly released from…