HomeNewsAnalysisThree Questions as Colombia’s Peace Talks Resume
ANALYSIS

Three Questions as Colombia’s Peace Talks Resume

COLOMBIA / 10 DEC 2014 BY ELYSSA PACHICO EN

More than three weeks after suspending talks with guerrilla group the FARC, the Colombian government has resumed negotiations with the rebels. But one of the toughest questions yet lies ahead for the peace process: will Colombia need to change its laws to assure guerrillas who may demobilize that they won’t be extradited to the US on drug trafficking charges, and if so, will the public tolerate it? 

According to El Tiempo, the US currently has extradition orders for 50 leaders of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), including eight leaders representing the group in the peace talks in Havana, who are accused of involvement in drug trafficking.

As InSight Crime has reported, the question of how to handle these extradition orders should the rebels demobilize has loomed over the peace talks since they began in November 2012. Even though the government and the guerrillas have already hashed out an agreement concerning the FARC’s political participation in a post-conflict Colombia — and have dealt with the issue of the drug trade — the negotiations still need to address what will happen to demobilized guerrillas once involved in drug trafficking.  

President Juan Manuel Santos tested the waters on this issue last week, when he said that Colombia should consider expanding its definition of “political crimes” so as to include drug trafficking. 

The logic behind such a move is this: if the FARC used drug trafficking to fund their insurgency against the state, and if, under Colombia law, drug trafficking were “connected” to a political crime like rebellion, then the guerrillas would receive amnesty. They could neither be prosecuted for drug trafficking charges in Colombia, nor could they be extradited to face charges abroad. 

SEE ALSO: FARC News and Profile

However, first Colombia would have to change its laws to establish this link between drug trafficking and political crimes, a proposal which has caused a huge public debate in Colombia. Rallying against Santos’ idea are figures like former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe, the biggest critic of the peace talks, and former President Andres Pastrana. On Santos’ side are Colombia’s Attorney General and former US President Bill Clinton, who said in a radio interview that the United States may support such a move.

Santos later expanded on his comments, explaining that he would never make drug trafficking as such a “political crime,” but that it was worth considering whether the use of money sourced from drug trafficking — and then channeled towards an insurgency — should be recognized as a political act. As noted by the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), Colombia’s courts may eventually have to take on the challenge of adjusting the law so that the definition of “political crime” is connected to drug trafficking used to fund a political insurgency, but not to other types of drug trafficking. 

As Colombia’s peace talks continue, there are three major questions worth considering while the Colombian government — and public — continue to debate over whether the FARC’s involvement in the drug trade should be considered a political crime:

1. If the law does change so that drug trafficking is “connected” to political crimes, what if Colombia’s other armed groups try to take advantage of this? Other major drug trafficking groups in Colombia — including the most powerful one, the Urabeños, and weaker ones like the Rastrojos and the Oficina de Envigado — may be tempted to argue that their drug trafficking crimes are connected to the political crime of belonging to a paramilitary-type group. But there’s already a precedent for Colombian law to treat these neo-paramilitary gangs separately from the guerrillas. These groups — known as “BACRIM”, from the Spanish acronym for “criminal bands” — were explicitly excluded from the 2012 law that provided a legal framework to allow for the FARC’s possible demobilization. Lawmakers are currently developing separate laws that would allow for the mass surrender of BACRIM.

2. Is the Colombian public ready to guarantee the FARC they will not be treated as drug traffickers under the law? It’s worth pointing out — as Verdad Abierta explains — that the issue of how to demobilize armed actors involved in the drug trade is a long-running debate in Colombia. It was only in the 1990s, when the FARC’s assault against the state was at its strongest, that Colombia really tightened its laws regarding which actions committed by the FARC could be considered “political crimes.”

Since then, the FARC’s military manpower has weakened and there’s been a slight paradigm shift regarding drug policy, with Colombia’s Senate meant to debate legalizing medical marijuana this week. But more progressive attitudes towards drug policy doesn’t necessarily mean that Colombians would tolerate the FARC receiving amnesty for drug trafficking. 

SEE ALSO: FARC, Peace and Possible Criminalization

3. What if, in a post-conflict Colombia, some elements of the FARC remain involved in the drug trade, claiming they are doing so to fund their “insurgency,” but are actually just interested in profiting from the cocaine trade? If Colombian law changes, won’t they technically still be shielded from prosecution? This will be another significant challenge facing Colombia’s courts — differentiating between those who can indeed be considered “insurgents,” versus those who are “pure” drug traffickers. 

Compartir icon icon icon

What are your thoughts? Click here to send InSight Crime your comments.

We encourage readers to copy and distribute our work for non-commercial purposes, with attribution to InSight Crime in the byline and links to the original at both the top and bottom of the article. Check the Creative Commons website for more details of how to share our work, and please send us an email if you use an article.

Related Content

COLOMBIA / 19 JUL 2012

The Colombian military seized 450 tons of illegally felled timber in the Pacific port of Buenaventura, drawing attention to the…

COLOMBIA / 28 APR 2013

Colombia's second largest guerrilla group, the ELN, may soon begin peace talks with the government, perhaps signalling an end to…

COLOMBIA / 7 SEP 2017

The most wanted drug trafficker in Colombia and leader of the powerful Urabeños has offered to surrender himself and his…

About InSight Crime

THE ORGANIZATION

We Have Updated Our Website

4 FEB 2021

Welcome to our new home page. We have revamped the site to create a better display and reader experience.

THE ORGANIZATION

InSight Crime Events – Border Crime: The Northern Triangle and Tri-Border Area

ARGENTINA / 25 JAN 2021

Through several rounds of extensive field investigations, our researchers have analyzed and mapped out the main illicit economies and criminal groups present in 39 border departments spread across the six countries of study – the Northern Triangle trio of Guatemala, Honduras, and El…

BRIEF

InSight Crime’s ‘Memo Fantasma’ Investigation Wins Simón Bolívar National Journalism Prize

COLOMBIA / 20 NOV 2020

The staff at InSight Crime was awarded the prestigious Simón Bolívar national journalism prize in Colombia for its two-year investigation into the drug trafficker known as “Memo Fantasma,” which was…

ANALYSIS

InSight Crime – From Uncovering Organized Crime to Finding What Works

COLOMBIA / 12 NOV 2020

This project began 10 years ago as an effort to address a problem: the lack of daily coverage, investigative stories and analysis of organized crime in the Americas. …

ANALYSIS

InSight Crime – Ten Years of Investigating Organized Crime in the Americas

FEATURED / 2 NOV 2020

In early 2009, Steven Dudley was in Medellín, Colombia. His assignment: speak to a jailed paramilitary leader in the Itagui prison, just south of the city. Following his interview inside…