Organized crime has long played a role in elections across Latin America and the Caribbean, from financing political campaigns to influencing local governance, voter participation, and state institutions through corruption, coercion, and violence. Tracking and understanding these dynamics is critical to explaining how criminal groups build political capital and how democratic institutions are weakened over time.
The Latest: Peru Elections 2026
Peru’s presidential run-off remains too close to call, with conservative Keiko Fujimori and leftist Roberto Sánchez Palomino locked in a technical tie as of June 8 and vote counting expected to continue for days—or even weeks.
The election pits two starkly different visions for the country against one another. Fujimori, making her fourth bid for the presidency, has promised a tough-on-crime crackdown inspired by the hardline policies of her father, former president Alberto Fujimori. Sánchez Palomino has focused more heavily on social inequality and institutional reform, while also pledging to address growing insecurity.
Many Peruvians hope the eventual winner can halt a cycle of political instability that has seen the country go through eight presidents in a decade, while organized crime has expanded across the country. Extortion, illegal mining, and corruption have all flourished amid years of political turmoil and weakened state institutions.
The deadlocked result suggests Peru’s political turmoil may be far from over, raising fresh questions about the next government’s ability to confront the country’s mounting security challenges.
Check back soon for InSight Crime’s analysis of Peru’s elections and the criminal threats facing the country’s next president.
For the last 15 years, InSight Crime has covered the relationship between organized crime and politics across the Americas. In Honduras, we broke the explosive narcovideo story that showed Carlos Zelaya, the brother-in-law of former President Xiomara Castro, negotiating bribes with several high-profile drug traffickers during Castro’s 2013 presidential campaign. In Guatemala, we have measured political risk and mapped the corruption and power networks that have shaped recent election cycles. We have also reported on how organized crime groups in Mexico and pro-government armed groups in Venezuela have used violence and intimidation to influence voting and maintain political control.
Below, you can find all of our coverage of elections and organized crime, separated by country.
Browse by Country
Colombia
Colombia’s powerful armed groups exert extensive control over territories and communities, shaping elections and influencing local politicians. For years, we have analyzed the security dynamics and policies shaping the country’s political landscape.
Ecuador
Organized crime was one of the main concerns in Ecuador’s last election. As an unprecedented wave of gang violence swept across the country, Daniel Noboa campaigned, and won, on a promise to use hardline policies against criminal groups.
Guatemala
Corruption has been the primary concern in Guatemala’s recent elections, with organized crime groups influencing votes by buying candidates, and powerful elites using institutions to exclude competitors and cling to power.
Honduras
Narcopolitics reigns in Honduras, where drug trafficking groups have funded political campaigns from the lowest to the highest echelons of politics. Here, we investigate the deep ties between elites and organized crime, and the rise and fall of Honduras’ most powerful actors.
Mexico
In Mexico, transnational criminal groups dominate many aspects of daily life. During election periods, these groups impose control by using violence to intimidate, influence, and eliminate candidates that refuse to negotiate with them.
Peru
Peru’s politics have been riddled with scandals in recent years, with ties to drug trafficking and corruption cases forcing several politicians to resign. These crises reveal how deeply corruption and organized crime have influenced Peru’s political system.
Venezuela
In Venezuela, the line between government and criminal interests is blurred, with state institutions coordinating and cooperating with criminal groups in search of money and power. Pro-government armed groups control elections in exchange for impunity, and state actors dabble in criminal economies for personal benefit.



